Exchange Rate $77,947 | Block height 974136

We publish a 4-minute weekly newsletter about agentic AI called Agents at Work. It’s just getting started, and we’d love if you’d subscribe and tell us what you like, what you don’t, and what you want to see more of.

Subscribe to Agents at Work →

From central-bank vaults to exchange wallets, ownership comes down to who controls the money.

Recently, Jamie Dimon sought to convince countries to stop taking their gold out of the United States.

“You’re not thinking clearly about safety. That gold is protected by the Atlantic, the Pacific, the United States military, the rule of law,” he said, defending American custody in a discussion of the dollar’s reserve status.

That is quite a security package. It also helps explain how the United States became the center of global finance. Countries sent their gold to New York for safekeeping, while the postwar monetary system placed the dollar at its center. American protection came with American power. Those wondering how the U.S. became a global hegemon might remember the real golden rule: Whoever has the gold makes the rules.

However, it leaves an awkward question unanswered: what happens when the owner and the protector disagree?

As GoldFix observed this week, protecting bullion from theft and ensuring its owner can retrieve it are different problems. A vault can be exceptionally secure while access to its contents remains subject to someone else’s decisions.

Bitcoin lets savers hold their money directly, without depending on a custodian to honor a claim.

Bitcoin currently faces plenty of headwinds, from bad macro news to exchange hacks that put pressure on its price. None of them changes what savers can own: a fixed share of a scarce, global monetary network, held without anyone else’s permission. The price reflects this week’s anxieties, yet the qualities that make bitcoin the best place to store value will outlast them.

An Ipsos survey for the DeFi Education Foundation found that just 19% of Americans believe the existing U.S. financial system is secure. Nearly three-quarters want changes that give people more control over their money, while 80% want greater control over their personal data.

People don’t need to understand bitcoin to recognize the problems it addresses. The opportunity is to make ownership, privacy, and control practical for everyday savers, then explain how to use them.

Binance reported a security breach affecting roughly $6.3 billion in assets and suspended deposits and withdrawals while investigating. By Friday, the exchange said it had reserved $6.34 billion to cover losses, while roughly $3 billion in affected assets had been frozen onchain.

Binance’s promise to make customers whole is welcome, but customers still have to wait for Binance to deliver. Holding your own bitcoin removes that particular dependency, provided you take securing it seriously.

Bitwise raised its 2036 bitcoin price target to $1.6 million, implying 34.3% annualized growth from its September 30 reference price. The firm’s updated outlook points to growing institutional demand and an expanding market for assets that protect wealth from currency debasement.

The interesting part is that Bitwise didn’t raise its market-share assumptions. Its target rose because the markets bitcoin can compete for got bigger, while the supply ceiling stayed exactly where Satoshi left it.

Countries most closely aligned with the United States bought $174.3 billion in Treasuries, excluding bills, during the first eight months of 2026, Bloomberg reported. That was down more than 60% from a year earlier, with some of Washington’s closest Asian partners leading the retreat.

Washington can count its allies, but it cannot count on them to keep financing its deficits. Bitcoin offers savers a reserve asset whose value proposition doesn’t require governments to find willing lenders indefinitely.

Tether reported $1.5 billion in third-quarter net operating profit, bringing its nine-month total to $4.5 billion. Its September 30 reserves attestation showed excess assets of $7.95 billion, up from $4.1 billion at the end of June.

More excess reserves strengthen a widely used bridge between dollars and bitcoin. The distinction still matters: USDT depends on an issuer and its reserves; bitcoin in self-custody gives savers direct ownership of the money itself.

Franklin Templeton launched FBEQ and FIBT, two ETFs that start with 95% stocks and 5% bitcoin exposure and direct stock dividends into additional bitcoin exposure.

VanEck launched its Wealth Builder ETF, combining stocks, bonds, real assets, and indirect bitcoin exposure in one fund.

Strive disclosed a $511.4 million purchase of 6,182 bitcoins, bringing its holdings to 43,000 BTC.

Google Cloud detailed a preview service for institutional bitcoin custody, with general availability targeted for early 2027.

Standard Asset Company announced a planned $1.5 billion strategy combining bitcoin reserves and UAE real estate, with Coinbase Asset Management managing its bitcoin holdings.

Mexico’s ArcadiaB partnered with AnchorWatch to offer multi-institution bitcoin custody through CustoBia, with service scheduled to launch in January 2027.

Learn one key idea about bitcoin each week. This week:

A prediction market lets people trade contracts tied to future events. Its larger promise is to reveal knowledge that would otherwise remain scattered, hidden, or ignored. When trying to predict future events, it’s almost always the case that someone knows something the prevailing consensus has missed. A financial incentive gives that person a financial incentive to leak what they know into the public discourse, and the resulting change in prediction market prices tells everyone else something useful.

In a Wall Street Journal essay, Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour distinguishes prediction exchanges from sportsbooks. An exchange matches traders rather than taking the other side of their bets. But that distinction leaves a more consequential question unanswered: Whose knowledge is allowed into the price?

Economist Robin Hanson, an early advocate of prediction markets, argued that insider-trading restrictions could obstruct their development as information sources. The ambition was to reward people for revealing what they knew, including knowledge that existing institutions had little incentive to surface. But if prediction markets were to become highly “compliant” they would effectively be banned from surfacing hidden knowledge and become nothing more than a new way to gamble.

Fast forward to today, and prediction platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi advertise both their forecasting power and their exclusion of insiders. Kalshi screens out categories of participants whose positions give them privileged information or influence over an outcome. Some restrictions have an obvious purpose, but knowing something and rigging something are different acts. A market that promises to discover hidden knowledge should be careful about making that knowledge grounds for disqualification.

Excluding informed traders does not make everyone left behind honest. Prediction markets now offer well-funded, highly motivated operators an opportunity to push prices around, manufacture public perception, and profit from people who mistake that movement for new information. The quoted probability becomes useful to the manipulator when journalists repeat it as an authoritative forecast.

Unfortunately, prediction market bets have become little more than scammy meme coins. Low liquidity, concentrated influence, and a compelling story about why the price means something profound are all qualities that prediction contracts share with “crypto” tokens.

The ambitious promise of prediction markets depends on bringing knowledge into the open. Exclude the people who possess it, leave the machinery of speculation intact, and you risk building another betting venue and lever for manipulation of public opinion.

The public gets yet another venue to chatter about odds. Exchanges like Polymarket and Kalshi rake in fees. Wealthy interests get another lever to influence politics. Whether anyone learned anything is another question.

18 years ago, on October 31, 2008, Satoshi Nakamoto announced bitcoin’s white paper to which online community?

A. The Cryptography Mailing List
B. The Bitcointalk forum
C. The Linux Kernel Mailing List
D. The Cypherpunks subreddit

Check your answer at the end of the page.

Follow us on X for more fresh content

Answer: A. The Cryptography Mailing List. Satoshi’s announcement carried the subject line “Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper.”

Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here.